By Robert-Alain De Beaugrande
This sequence is meant for college kids at either postgraduate and undergraduate degrees, and goals at supplying a huge view of the topic corresponding to is hard to procure solely from scholarly journals and monographs. "Linguistic idea" is a survey of the best paintings of an important 20th-century linguisticians, together with de Saussure, Firth, Chomsky, Halliday and Van Dijk. An figuring out of previous theories is important to learning smooth linguistics and this article offers either the variety of theories in themselves as they constructed chronologically and a ancient point of view on that improvement. to do that the writer employs the weird technique of a detailed studying of those works as discourse performances and strives to discover their details and features within the linguists' personal phrases. the writer makes use of the ancient viewpoint to evaluate the long run clients for linguistic research and distinct scrutiny is made up of how some distance the linguists their very own theories.
Read or Download Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works PDF
Best foreign language study & reference books
The Emergence of Semantics in Four Linguistic Traditions: Hebrew, Sanskrit, Greek, Arabic
This examine goals to supply a comparative research of the function of semantics within the linguistic conception of 4 grammatical traditions - Sanskrit, Hebrew, Greek, and Arabic.
A Word or Two Before You Go . . . . Brief essays on language
Engl. Language and experiences
Fremde Welten: Die Oper des italienischen Verismo
Mit diesem Buch erfährt der Opernverismo erstmals eine umfassende Gesamtdarstellung. Die Rahmenbedingungen für seine Durchsetzung im internationalen Opernbetrieb werden ebenso in den Blick genommen wie die Entstehung, Verbreitung und Rezeption der veristischen Oper.
Extra info for Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works
Concepts in class I ‘involve no relation’ except what is ‘implied in defining one concept against another’; concepts in II ‘concern only the radical element, not the sentence’; concepts in III ‘transcend the particular word’; and concepts in IV give ‘the proposition’ ‘definite syntactic form’. Class I is ‘normally expressed by independent words or radical elements’, and the other classes by ‘affixing non-radical elements to radical elements’. Sapir conjectures that ‘concepts of class I’ and ‘IV’ ‘are ‘essential to all speech’, whereas ‘II and III are both common, but not essential’ (SL 102).
But elsewhere he says it is ‘a serious mistake to consider dissimilar facts as a single phenomenon’ (CG 146). 7 Nor is the word a reliable tool for theory: ‘starting from words in defining things is a bad procedure’, and ‘all definitions of words are made in vain’ (CG 14). 8 The study of etymology falls between the cracks in Saussure's scheme, since it is historical and yet not limited to word-sounds. 75. 9 In denying ‘phonetic doublets’, Saussure dispatches one case because one of two forms ‘is only a learned borrowing’; two more cases are passed over as ‘literary French’ (CG 156) (cf.
Accordingly, ‘such relational concepts must be expressed as moor the concrete concepts to each other and construct a definite, fundamental form of proposition’ allowing ‘no doubt as to the nature of the relations’. ‘Most languages’ ‘throw a bold bridge between’ ‘the concrete and the abstractly relational’ (SL 95). 43) and suggests another ‘scheme’ for the ‘classification of concepts as expressed in language’, proceeding through ‘a gradual loss of the concrete’ (SL 100, 103). He enumerates: ‘I. Basic Concrete Concepts’; ‘II.