Download Generative and Non-Linear Phonology by Jacques Durand PDF

By Jacques Durand

Generative phonology is a constructing box of linguistics, and is generating either rival interpretations and versions. This ebook presents a transparent and obtainable assessment of the controversy. It offers an in depth evaluate of the most versions, revealing that they're frequently complimentary instead of contradictory, and the way those might be interconnect and be used jointly to discover the topic.

Show description

Read Online or Download Generative and Non-Linear Phonology PDF

Similar foreign language study & reference books

The Emergence of Semantics in Four Linguistic Traditions: Hebrew, Sanskrit, Greek, Arabic

This learn goals to supply a comparative research of the function of semantics within the linguistic thought of 4 grammatical traditions - Sanskrit, Hebrew, Greek, and Arabic.

Fremde Welten: Die Oper des italienischen Verismo

Mit diesem Buch erfährt der Opernverismo erstmals eine umfassende Gesamtdarstellung. Die Rahmenbedingungen für seine Durchsetzung im internationalen Opernbetrieb werden ebenso in den Blick genommen wie die Entstehung, Verbreitung und Rezeption der veristischen Oper.

Extra info for Generative and Non-Linear Phonology

Sample text

3. 3. 2. I Phonotactic statements One dimension of the phonology of all languages which must be accounted for is the statement of sequences of phonemes which are allowed within words. This falls under the technical label 'phonotactics'. In this section, we examine an interesting portion of the phonotactics of English. Words in English can start with zero, one, two or three consonants (cf ant, cant, plain, spruce). If we consider words which start with three consonants a simple generalization can be made.

Moreover, the addition of ce to est, pronounced [e] by itself, gives rise to [c] ([cs;:l]) in accord with MVLOW. If we compare the behaviour of ce described above with the suffixation of -eux [o] to peur [prer] 'fear', which gives rise to peureux [porn] 'fearful', we can see why we want to treat schwa differently from other vowels from a phonological point of view. Phonetically, however, schwa can merge with [o] as mentioned in (b ). Suppose, however, that playing devil's advocate, somebody were to suggest that since a word like ne is pronounced like nceud [no] and can never be cliticized and realized, say, as [nre], there is no reason to depart from phonetic reality and transcribe it as /n;:l/.

Lz] [q:] //z// /z( /s/ [z] [i] [s] / I For linguists like Bloomfield and Hockett, among others, it is, however, clear that morphophonemic representations were set up simply for convenience and, unlike phonemic representations, had a purely conventional status. As for the order of rules, Bloomfield (1933: 13) says of it: 'The terms "before, after, first, then" and so on in such statements, tell the descriptive order [the emphasis is Bloomfield's - JD]. ' Standard generative phonology starts from the position that the kind of argumentation which leads to the postulation of, say, //z// as the underlying form for the plural is of the same type as that which guides the 'ascent' from allophones to phonemes.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.61 of 5 – based on 44 votes